Saturday, May 30, 2009

SPDC 2010 elections - Upheaval in the making

SPDC 2010 elections - Upheaval in the making.pdf


Monday, May 25, 2009

Burmese people need outside help to achieve freedom

Published on May 26, 2009

CASE 47/2009 sounds mundane enough. But, as this case unfolds, the future of a nation is in the balance. The number is the file reference of Aung San Suu Kyi's trial in Insein Prison in Rangoon, which started on May 18. All the world knows the charges are trumped up and that the military regime is simply seeking to find a neat means of locking up the democracy leader again. Yet, inexplicably, we watch as the trial goes on. Here is a moment when the international community must pause and consider the history that is unfurling around it. Now is the time for world governments and organisations to act and to end the 47-year-long military dictatorship in Burma.

The facts are that Aung San Suu Kyi's period of house detention was due to come to an end on May 27. This period of incarceration should be deemed illegal not only in relation to international law, but in contravention of Burma's own legal statutes and by the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention. So, finding a "legal" means of locking up Aung San Suu Kyi again, and to deny her any connection with elections planned in 2010, became an imperative for the junta.

It is also a sign that the Burmese military is panicking as international pressure mounts for Aung San Suu Kyi's release. This trial is a rash and hurried lurch by a jittery regime to temper the waves of outcry over its hardline approach.

International inaction might be understandable, but not perhaps justified, if we were talking about a tiny nation on the margins of regional and global relations. Burma is none of these things. With a population of some 50 million, it is potentially one of Asia's richest and most go-ahead countries. Traditionally high literacy rates and high rates of English-language competency add to its potential. Burma is also positioned in a strategically vital area, nestled between India and China.

Quite apart from the moral imperative, there is a significant strategic motivation to secure democracy in Burma. The possibility of "failed state" status - a categorisation that may already apply - for such a strategically and economically important nation should focus even the mind of the most Realpolitik-enamoured policy wonk. The regional implications alone are significant.

The international community must approach this current crisis with both short-term and longer-term agendas in mind.

First, and most pressingly, the immediate and unconditional release of Aung San Suu Kyi, along with the remaining 2,000-plus political prisoners in Burma, must be secured.

The best means of doing this will likely be through an immediate visit to Burma by the United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, and action to which he has already committed. Intervening in this way would be a powerful symbol, and few share his ability to directly defuse the current tensions and to facilitate a multi-party dialogue to lead towards a process of national reconciliation of all relevant parties.

This action would be best empowered through an emergency session of the United Nations Security Council. Here, a presidential statement can mobilise the Secretary-General's Office and can also discuss initiatives for a medium-term international response to the current situation and beyond.

Once the immediate crisis has been resolved, the international community will then have to consider the future of Burma.

The National League for Democracy, the party led by Aung San Suu Kyi, has been clear that it aims for reconciliation not retribution. Recently, the NLD produced the Shwegonedaing Declaration, which confirmed the party's belief in ensuring that the military is part of the process of national rebuilding.

No democracy can take root amid the turmoil of revenge and power grabs. A long-term solution requires a mature view and, driven by the non-violent and conciliatory approach of Aung San Suu Kyi herself, Burma's democracy movement is keenly aware of its responsibilities.

A viable plan of action has already been devised by the NLD, the wider democracy movement, ethnic parties and the government in exile.

The US has recently extended targeted sanctions on Burma, yet has also raised the possibility of a softly-softly approach. How this might be played out remains the purview of Washington, but we would stress that the time is now and that our plan offers a sustainable means of bringing a lasting democracy to Burma.

Burma's critical moment appears to have arrived and it needs the ability to act and to move quickly, as well as a cool hand amid the chaos to guide the process to a longer-term conclusion. We beseech the international community to seize this moment, to help our country recover and to ensure Aung San Suu Kyi one day is allowed to be free among the people for whom she has sacrificed so much.

Dr Thaung Htun is the UN representative for the National Coalition Government of the Union of Burma - the government in exile.
The Nation


Wednesday, May 20, 2009

ေရႊခေမာက္ (၉၇)

Shwekhamauk bulletin (97).pdf


Tuesday, May 12, 2009

12-5-09 AIPMC Myanmar News Update No. 116

MNU 116.pdf


Sunday, May 10, 2009

PDC Monthly News Commentary April 2009

PDC Monthly News Commentary - May 2009.pdf ႏိုင္ငံေရးအံတုမွဳေကာ္မတီ၏ လစဥ္သတင္းသံုးသပ္ခ်က္။
PDC Monthly News Commentary April 2009 (Eng).pdf


Saturday, May 2, 2009

AIPMC Myanmar News Update No. 115 Covering April 27 – April 30, 2009

MNU 115.pdf


Friday, May 1, 2009

Altsean April 2009 Burma Bulletin

Altsean April 2009 Burma Bulletin.pdf


30-4-09 The statement by AIPMC on Richard Lugar's Report

The statement by AIPMC on the Report to the Committee on Foreign Relations United States Senate by Senator Richard Lugar "Trafficking and Extortion of Burmese Migrants in Malaysia and Southern Thailand".
AIPMC Statement on trafficking Lugar Report 30-4-09.pdf
A copy of the report is also available at